While reading the latest issue of the NYRB this morning, it
occurred to me that the reason why I now read mostly magazines instead of books
isn't because I’m old and my mind is failing (although that’s certainly true),
so I can’t concentrate long enough to finish a book; it’s because most new books
seldom have anything new to say—at least not anything that’s new to me. Most of the new books I read merely repeat
what older books say, and usually not as well.
Most people nowadays seldom read books, so authors know they must tell them things all educated people used to know, in words of one or two syllables. Magazine editors—at least editors of the magazines to which I subscribe— know their subscribers read regularly or they wouldn’t be subscribers, and choose their articles accordingly.
On receiving the latest copy of a magazine, I look
through it not only to see which articles seem interesting, but also to see how
the editor(s) organised the issue. I
understand the art of editing, having done it myself, and admire the skill with
which the editor(s) of the magazines to which I subscribe do it. I like to see how one article refers, en
passant, to something that’s the subject of another, and how all the articles refer,
however indirectly, to the general theme of the issue.
The general theme of the latest issue of the NYRB is
decadence. But that’s the general theme
of everything people write, say and think nowadays.
Cultural survival—how artifacts prized by one generation
are scorned as obsolete and abandoned by a later generation, only to be
recovered by an even later generation—is the
subject of several articles in this issue.
To write about the recovery of the past is also to write about decadence,
because more is always lost than recovered.
But it doesn’t matter what we remember and what we forget, because each
generation’s wisest people always tell us the same thing—that in order to live a good
life, we must love each other—only in different words. And we never listen, because it isn’t love we
want. It’s revenge.
Balzac said le secret des grandes fortunes sans cause
apparente est un crime oublié, parce qu'il a été proprement fait.
Every society,
whatever the laws on which it’s founded, eventually divides into masters and
slaves as the antisocial minority plunder the commonwealth. In order to live together without killing
each other, masters and slaves must both forget the crime which created that
division and pretend, or try to pretend, they love each other.
Idque apud imperitos humanitas
vocabatur, cum pars servitutis esset. Whether people pay homage to
the laws on which their society was founded, or scorn them as obsolete doesn’t
matter, because either way they don’t live by those laws. Every society is a criminal conspiracy in
which the majority resign themselves to being victimized, and the antisocial minority
take their surrender as proof they deserve to be victimized. Not love, but sadomasochism enables us to
live together without killing each other.
The artifacts we save, or recover, and used to call
civilisation are always ruins, so we’ve learned to love ruins. All that we build decays, so we memorialize its
decay, as in Kafka’s parable leopards break into the temple and desecrate
the holy ritual again and again, until their desecration becomes part of the
ritual.
We try to build something solid and lasting, but what we
used to call civilization is no more than a stage set in a théâtre
du Grand Guignol, and history a play in which we’re assigned rôles
by the theater’s owner/managers. Some play
their rôles so well they forget who and what they are; but sleepwalkers always wake
eventually, and then all that seemed to them solid melts into air.
No comments:
Post a Comment